The first, and so far only, opinion poll on the performance of Bangladesh’s current government’s performance found law and order to be the area of its greatest weakness. That was in April. Casual observation of the media — newspapers as well as TV news and talk shows — suggest the law and order has slided a lot further in the months since. Anecdotal evidence from friends and family support the view. Syeed Ahamed puts it this way:
Such social disorder contradicts the whole purpose of having a national government. Citizens elect a group of persons among themselves as the government of the country so that law and order is maintained. It is perceived as a “social contract” between the people and the government, implying that the people give up some rights to the government in order to receive social order. Most historical accounts suggest this as the reason of establishing states and affirm that the principal task of the government is to maintain law and order. Issues such as taxation, budget, development works, and poverty reduction came much later as other government duties.
And the government’s reaction — return of the ‘crossfire’ under a new name — suggests that it is taking the problem seriously.
When one starts thinking about the issue, the following points/questions stand out:
1. Crossfires aka encounters aka gunfights aka extrajudicial killings are clear violation of Awami League’s election pledge.
2. It’s not even clear that we have a violent crimes problem that require such drastic measures.
3. The real law and order problem has no quick fix.