Do best pictures really win?

Posted in movies by jrahman on February 22, 2009

Dear reader, these are difficult times.  The global economy is facing the severest slump in generations, while Bangladesh has been rocked by renewed Islamist militancy.   Bad news are all around us, and things will probably get worse before they get better.  All the more reason then that we take a break from the doom and gloom and set off to the movies. 

Well, not quite off to the movies literally, but let’s ask a question that’s different from the usual topics in these pages.  The Academy Awards, Oscar, are upon us.  Slumdog Millionaire is the odds on favourite.  But is that the best movie of the year?  How often does the year’s best picture actually win the Oscar?  Put differently, how does posteriority treat an Oscar winner?  And what’s the metric of ‘best’ anyway? 

These questions come up every year.  You see, Oscar, like the Nobel for subjects other than natural sciences, or the Man Booker or Pultizer, involves a lot of politicking and lobbying and broader socio-cultural trends.  With the ’emergence of India’ being a favourite talking point of the global cognoscenti, it may not be all that surprising that Slumdog will win the Oscar, just as it may not have been surprising to see Arvind Adiga’s White Tiger win last year’s Booker.  More about the book some other time, but is Slumdog the best movie of 2008?  Let’s be more specific, was it the best movie available to the general filmgoing public in the Anglophone world in 2008? 

We can use the IMDB’s ratings (details at the bottom of this page) to answer this question.  Registered voters in IMDB are movie buffs whose ratings probably reflects artistic appreciation better than box office takings would, while the large number and anonymous nature of the membership would mean these ratings are free of the politiciking that afflicts Oscars.  According to the IMDB regulars, 2008’s best movie was The Dark Knight (6th in top 250, with 8.9 score from over 347,000 users).  Slumdog Millionaire is 34th in top 250 (8.6 score from 67,700 users).  Personally, I think the Batman sequel is one of the best movies of all time, and not just for the politics, but this didn’t even get nominated for Oscar. 

So, how often does the IMDB best picture win?  Not that often it turns out.  80 Oscars have been handed out so far, and only 17 of them are considered best pictures of the year according to the IMDB.  That is, the Academy has got it right only 21.25% times!  Quite miserable, really.

However, they are getting better.  In 3 of the past 5 years the best picture won the Oscar.  Only time when the Academy performed better was between 1970 and 1978, when they got it right 6 out of 9 years.  The whole list is attached as an image.  A few trivia.

  • The IMDB number 1, The Shawshank Redemption, lost to Forrest Gump (44) in 1994.  Two of IMDB top 10 — Il buono, il brutto, il cattivo and The Dark Knight — didn’t even get nominated.
  • On the flipside, three Oscar-winning blockbusters — Gone with the wind, Ben-Hur and Titanic — weren’t the best movie of the year.  In fact, Titanic, the biggest grossing movie of all time, isn’t even in IMDB top 250!
  • If it wins, Slumdog Millionaire will be the 2nd South Asia related movie to take an Oscar, the first being Gandhi (165) of 1982.  The best movie of that year was Blade Runner (109).  There is no other South Asia related movie in the IMDB top 250.


Tagged with:

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Joruri Khobor said, on February 27, 2009 at 7:35 am

    Here’s a take on SM by Joruri Khobor that you might find interesting.

  2. fug said, on February 27, 2009 at 11:02 pm

    miracle at st anna’s was the best

  3. All about Citizen Mati « Mukti said, on January 7, 2013 at 11:30 am

    […] About Eve, the Oscar-winner in 1950, is a drama set in the black-and-white era Broadway.  It shows how the seemingly innocent […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: